*/
In March, I was at the Royal Courts of Justice to welcome the new Attorney General and the new Solicitor General, on behalf of the Bar, as they were sworn in by the Lord Chief Justice.
As I said in my remarks at the ceremony, I was in the unusual position of welcoming a new Attorney General while wishing his predecessor a return to office in the near future. That was because Parliament has now made provision under the Ministerial and Other Maternity Allowances Act 2021 for senior ministers, who are about to become mothers, to take time off for maternity leave. The Act was not only bespoke in its origin, rushed through to cover the maternity leave of the departing Attorney General, but attracted controversy on its passage through Parliament. The original use of the term ‘person’ did not find favour in the Upper House and was replaced with the more obvious reference to ‘mother’. Despite this hiccup, the Act is an important milestone.
Under the previous rules, the Attorney General would have had to resign her post if she had wanted to take leave or would have had her ministerial duties split between other ministers rather than having a full-time replacement. That result would not only have been blatantly unfair but also out of step with working life in the 21st century. According to figures published by the Office for National Statistics, the proportion of working mothers with dependent children now exceeds 75% and has been rising steadily in recent years. The recognition by Parliament of this changed working landscape and the need to ensure that having a young family is not incompatible with senior roles in government or opposition is only to be welcomed. It was fitting perhaps that the swearing in of the first Attorney General to undertake the role as part of arrangements for maternity cover should have taken place in the same week as International Women’s Day and in Women’s History Month. It is to be hoped, as has been intimated, that further and broader legislation to address paternity or shared parental leave and adoption leave for members of Parliament is planned.
Our own profession also has issues to address. While men and women now embark upon a career at the Bar in equal numbers, there remain significant challenges to career progression. The QCA has made two grants available to the Bar Council over a period of two years, 2019 to 2021, to develop programmes and support that might enable and encourage more women to successfully apply for silk.
The first phase of this programme, captured under our ‘Modernising the Bar’ campaign, finished in early 2020 and involved extensive research to find the barriers to women’s retention and progression. The second phase, which is ongoing, involves some nine projects designed to address the challenges identified:
Of course, no single intervention will address the challenges faced by female members of the profession. The Bar Council is committed to sustained long-term activity across all the areas identified, beyond the life of the initial QCA grant. The COVID-19 pandemic has made the situation even more challenging for women and other underrepresented groups at the Bar, particularly in publicly funded practice. Despite the difficulties of the last year, progress across many of the nine projects has been made but it is depressing that in 2021, tackling sexual harassment remains one of the issues that emerged from the initial research and found its way onto the list.
On the day before I attended the swearing-in ceremony I, and Elaine Banton, the Chair of the Bar Council’s Equality, Diversity & Social Mobility Committee wrote to the Bar Standards Board and Bar Disciplinary Tribunal to express concerns about the handling of harassment cases and to ask for further information about the investigation and sanctions process as part of the BSB’s sanctions review. I know that both of those bodies do want to make progress in ensuring that harassment is recognised as unacceptable and a serious disciplinary matter.
Although the Bar Council’s programme of work in this area has confirmed that old problems have not gone away, it also identified an appetite for change. More recent events have shown that wider changes in society around the same issues are also overdue.
Derek Sweeting KC is Chair of the Bar for 2021. He is a silk at 7BR.
In March, I was at the Royal Courts of Justice to welcome the new Attorney General and the new Solicitor General, on behalf of the Bar, as they were sworn in by the Lord Chief Justice.
As I said in my remarks at the ceremony, I was in the unusual position of welcoming a new Attorney General while wishing his predecessor a return to office in the near future. That was because Parliament has now made provision under the Ministerial and Other Maternity Allowances Act 2021 for senior ministers, who are about to become mothers, to take time off for maternity leave. The Act was not only bespoke in its origin, rushed through to cover the maternity leave of the departing Attorney General, but attracted controversy on its passage through Parliament. The original use of the term ‘person’ did not find favour in the Upper House and was replaced with the more obvious reference to ‘mother’. Despite this hiccup, the Act is an important milestone.
Under the previous rules, the Attorney General would have had to resign her post if she had wanted to take leave or would have had her ministerial duties split between other ministers rather than having a full-time replacement. That result would not only have been blatantly unfair but also out of step with working life in the 21st century. According to figures published by the Office for National Statistics, the proportion of working mothers with dependent children now exceeds 75% and has been rising steadily in recent years. The recognition by Parliament of this changed working landscape and the need to ensure that having a young family is not incompatible with senior roles in government or opposition is only to be welcomed. It was fitting perhaps that the swearing in of the first Attorney General to undertake the role as part of arrangements for maternity cover should have taken place in the same week as International Women’s Day and in Women’s History Month. It is to be hoped, as has been intimated, that further and broader legislation to address paternity or shared parental leave and adoption leave for members of Parliament is planned.
Our own profession also has issues to address. While men and women now embark upon a career at the Bar in equal numbers, there remain significant challenges to career progression. The QCA has made two grants available to the Bar Council over a period of two years, 2019 to 2021, to develop programmes and support that might enable and encourage more women to successfully apply for silk.
The first phase of this programme, captured under our ‘Modernising the Bar’ campaign, finished in early 2020 and involved extensive research to find the barriers to women’s retention and progression. The second phase, which is ongoing, involves some nine projects designed to address the challenges identified:
Of course, no single intervention will address the challenges faced by female members of the profession. The Bar Council is committed to sustained long-term activity across all the areas identified, beyond the life of the initial QCA grant. The COVID-19 pandemic has made the situation even more challenging for women and other underrepresented groups at the Bar, particularly in publicly funded practice. Despite the difficulties of the last year, progress across many of the nine projects has been made but it is depressing that in 2021, tackling sexual harassment remains one of the issues that emerged from the initial research and found its way onto the list.
On the day before I attended the swearing-in ceremony I, and Elaine Banton, the Chair of the Bar Council’s Equality, Diversity & Social Mobility Committee wrote to the Bar Standards Board and Bar Disciplinary Tribunal to express concerns about the handling of harassment cases and to ask for further information about the investigation and sanctions process as part of the BSB’s sanctions review. I know that both of those bodies do want to make progress in ensuring that harassment is recognised as unacceptable and a serious disciplinary matter.
Although the Bar Council’s programme of work in this area has confirmed that old problems have not gone away, it also identified an appetite for change. More recent events have shown that wider changes in society around the same issues are also overdue.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
