*/
A surge in the number of DIY litigants has prompted legal profession leaders to publish guidance to help lawyers deal with unrepresented litigants.
The 28-page guide, produced by the Bar Council, Law Society and Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, told lawyers to adopt a “professional, co-operative and courteous approach” to litigants in person (LiPs).
It said lawyers should “communicate clearly” and “avoid any technical language or legal jargon” that might intimidate and antagonise already disadvantaged litigants.
Lawyers are further advised to “avoid using inflammatory words or phrases that suggest or cause a dispute where there is none, or inflame a dispute, and avoid expressing any personal opinions on the LiP’s behaviour”.
The guide assists lawyers on how to help LiPs without putting themselves in breach of their duties to their own client. It deals with issues including correspondence, telephone calls, drafting and adjournments.
Chairman of the Bar, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: “The people who lose out most from the rising tide of litigants in person are the litigants themselves.
“It is one of the worst outcomes of the legal aid cuts that people facing major life events such as a family break up, have little choice but to put their case alone and without legal support or representation.”
A surge in the number of DIY litigants has prompted legal profession leaders to publish guidance to help lawyers deal with unrepresented litigants.
The 28-page guide, produced by the Bar Council, Law Society and Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, told lawyers to adopt a “professional, co-operative and courteous approach” to litigants in person (LiPs).
It said lawyers should “communicate clearly” and “avoid any technical language or legal jargon” that might intimidate and antagonise already disadvantaged litigants.
Lawyers are further advised to “avoid using inflammatory words or phrases that suggest or cause a dispute where there is none, or inflame a dispute, and avoid expressing any personal opinions on the LiP’s behaviour”.
The guide assists lawyers on how to help LiPs without putting themselves in breach of their duties to their own client. It deals with issues including correspondence, telephone calls, drafting and adjournments.
Chairman of the Bar, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: “The people who lose out most from the rising tide of litigants in person are the litigants themselves.
“It is one of the worst outcomes of the legal aid cuts that people facing major life events such as a family break up, have little choice but to put their case alone and without legal support or representation.”
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC present their best buys for this holiday season
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
