*/
A surge in the number of DIY litigants has prompted legal profession leaders to publish guidance to help lawyers deal with unrepresented litigants.
The 28-page guide, produced by the Bar Council, Law Society and Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, told lawyers to adopt a “professional, co-operative and courteous approach” to litigants in person (LiPs).
It said lawyers should “communicate clearly” and “avoid any technical language or legal jargon” that might intimidate and antagonise already disadvantaged litigants.
Lawyers are further advised to “avoid using inflammatory words or phrases that suggest or cause a dispute where there is none, or inflame a dispute, and avoid expressing any personal opinions on the LiP’s behaviour”.
The guide assists lawyers on how to help LiPs without putting themselves in breach of their duties to their own client. It deals with issues including correspondence, telephone calls, drafting and adjournments.
Chairman of the Bar, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: “The people who lose out most from the rising tide of litigants in person are the litigants themselves.
“It is one of the worst outcomes of the legal aid cuts that people facing major life events such as a family break up, have little choice but to put their case alone and without legal support or representation.”
A surge in the number of DIY litigants has prompted legal profession leaders to publish guidance to help lawyers deal with unrepresented litigants.
The 28-page guide, produced by the Bar Council, Law Society and Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, told lawyers to adopt a “professional, co-operative and courteous approach” to litigants in person (LiPs).
It said lawyers should “communicate clearly” and “avoid any technical language or legal jargon” that might intimidate and antagonise already disadvantaged litigants.
Lawyers are further advised to “avoid using inflammatory words or phrases that suggest or cause a dispute where there is none, or inflame a dispute, and avoid expressing any personal opinions on the LiP’s behaviour”.
The guide assists lawyers on how to help LiPs without putting themselves in breach of their duties to their own client. It deals with issues including correspondence, telephone calls, drafting and adjournments.
Chairman of the Bar, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: “The people who lose out most from the rising tide of litigants in person are the litigants themselves.
“It is one of the worst outcomes of the legal aid cuts that people facing major life events such as a family break up, have little choice but to put their case alone and without legal support or representation.”
The Bar Council is ready to support a turn to the efficiencies that will make a difference
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
Ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC continues his series explaining the impact on barristers. In part 2, a worked example shows the specific practicalities of adapting to the new system
Resolution of the criminal justice crisis does not lie in reheating old ideas that have been roundly rejected before, say Ed Vickers KC, Faras Baloch and Katie Bacon
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
Jury-less trial proposals threaten fairness, legitimacy and democracy without ending the backlog, writes Professor Cheryl Thomas KC (Hon), the UK’s leading expert on juries, judges and courts