*/
Civil and family practitioners will bear the brunt of sweeping cuts to legal aid.
Public funding is to be withdrawn from family law cases, such as divorce and child contact, and from debt, education, employment, housing, clinical negligence, immigration and welfare benefits.
The MoJ estimates the cuts will save £350 million. Practitioners have until Valentine’s Day to respond to the consultation, “Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales”.
Funding will remain in place “where people’s life or liberty is at stake, or where they are at risk of serious physical harm, or immediate loss of their home”.
Legal aid is therefore retained for asylum, mental health, housing cases where someone’s home is at immediate risk, and cases involving domestic violence, forced marriage or where children are being taken into care.
Fees paid in all civil and family cases will be reduced by ten per cent. Peter Lodder QC, Vice-Chairman of the Bar Council, said the effects would be “brutal”.
The cuts in rates would be “tough for the young Bar”, who might struggle to build their practices, he said.
“So there will be a challenge for many practitioners to diversify. The Bar has demonstrated its ability in the past to adapt to the new environments and looking ahead the publicly funded Bar will have to compete harder for work.
“There is no doubt there will continue to be opportunities for the Bar to win advocacy and advisory work on the strength of the quality of its work and its comparative cost advantages against other service providers. To take advantage of these opportunities the Bar needs to be prepared for change.
“It is in the public interest that there is a strong and independent Bar to provide access to justice and also to ensure that the administration of justice is efficient and effective.”
Public funding is to be withdrawn from family law cases, such as divorce and child contact, and from debt, education, employment, housing, clinical negligence, immigration and welfare benefits.
The MoJ estimates the cuts will save £350 million. Practitioners have until Valentine’s Day to respond to the consultation, “Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales”.
Funding will remain in place “where people’s life or liberty is at stake, or where they are at risk of serious physical harm, or immediate loss of their home”.
Legal aid is therefore retained for asylum, mental health, housing cases where someone’s home is at immediate risk, and cases involving domestic violence, forced marriage or where children are being taken into care.
Fees paid in all civil and family cases will be reduced by ten per cent. Peter Lodder QC, Vice-Chairman of the Bar Council, said the effects would be “brutal”.
The cuts in rates would be “tough for the young Bar”, who might struggle to build their practices, he said.
“So there will be a challenge for many practitioners to diversify. The Bar has demonstrated its ability in the past to adapt to the new environments and looking ahead the publicly funded Bar will have to compete harder for work.
“There is no doubt there will continue to be opportunities for the Bar to win advocacy and advisory work on the strength of the quality of its work and its comparative cost advantages against other service providers. To take advantage of these opportunities the Bar needs to be prepared for change.
“It is in the public interest that there is a strong and independent Bar to provide access to justice and also to ensure that the administration of justice is efficient and effective.”
Civil and family practitioners will bear the brunt of sweeping cuts to legal aid.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Animal sexual abuse is a distressing and taboo subject. Yet, write Christina Warner and Maya Badham, this hidden crisis, where legal, ethical and psychological factors converge, requires frank discussion
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier