*/
Civil and family practitioners will bear the brunt of sweeping cuts to legal aid.
Public funding is to be withdrawn from family law cases, such as divorce and child contact, and from debt, education, employment, housing, clinical negligence, immigration and welfare benefits.
The MoJ estimates the cuts will save £350 million. Practitioners have until Valentine’s Day to respond to the consultation, “Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales”.
Funding will remain in place “where people’s life or liberty is at stake, or where they are at risk of serious physical harm, or immediate loss of their home”.
Legal aid is therefore retained for asylum, mental health, housing cases where someone’s home is at immediate risk, and cases involving domestic violence, forced marriage or where children are being taken into care.
Fees paid in all civil and family cases will be reduced by ten per cent. Peter Lodder QC, Vice-Chairman of the Bar Council, said the effects would be “brutal”.
The cuts in rates would be “tough for the young Bar”, who might struggle to build their practices, he said.
“So there will be a challenge for many practitioners to diversify. The Bar has demonstrated its ability in the past to adapt to the new environments and looking ahead the publicly funded Bar will have to compete harder for work.
“There is no doubt there will continue to be opportunities for the Bar to win advocacy and advisory work on the strength of the quality of its work and its comparative cost advantages against other service providers. To take advantage of these opportunities the Bar needs to be prepared for change.
“It is in the public interest that there is a strong and independent Bar to provide access to justice and also to ensure that the administration of justice is efficient and effective.”
Public funding is to be withdrawn from family law cases, such as divorce and child contact, and from debt, education, employment, housing, clinical negligence, immigration and welfare benefits.
The MoJ estimates the cuts will save £350 million. Practitioners have until Valentine’s Day to respond to the consultation, “Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales”.
Funding will remain in place “where people’s life or liberty is at stake, or where they are at risk of serious physical harm, or immediate loss of their home”.
Legal aid is therefore retained for asylum, mental health, housing cases where someone’s home is at immediate risk, and cases involving domestic violence, forced marriage or where children are being taken into care.
Fees paid in all civil and family cases will be reduced by ten per cent. Peter Lodder QC, Vice-Chairman of the Bar Council, said the effects would be “brutal”.
The cuts in rates would be “tough for the young Bar”, who might struggle to build their practices, he said.
“So there will be a challenge for many practitioners to diversify. The Bar has demonstrated its ability in the past to adapt to the new environments and looking ahead the publicly funded Bar will have to compete harder for work.
“There is no doubt there will continue to be opportunities for the Bar to win advocacy and advisory work on the strength of the quality of its work and its comparative cost advantages against other service providers. To take advantage of these opportunities the Bar needs to be prepared for change.
“It is in the public interest that there is a strong and independent Bar to provide access to justice and also to ensure that the administration of justice is efficient and effective.”
Civil and family practitioners will bear the brunt of sweeping cuts to legal aid.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Responding to criticism on the narrow profile of government-instructed counsel, Mel Nebhrajani CB describes the system-wide change at GLD to drive fairer distribution of work and broader development of talent
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse