*/
‘What is an acceptable face of justice?’ asked Marvin Rees, Bristol’s Mayor at BarNone’s launch event on 23 July 2020. It is a question, on the Western Circuit, that we have started to ask ourselves.
For us it is notable that no full-time circuit judge on the Western Circuit appears to be from an ethnic minority. Let’s break this down – there are 12 crown court centres on the Western Circuit, comprised of between one to eight full-time judges. All are white. Each of the resident judges is white and male.
At Bristol Crown Court alone there are eight full-time circuit judges, all of whom are white men. Meanwhile, according to city council data, 16% of the population of Bristol is Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic (BAME) with 28% of Bristol’s 0 to 5 year olds belonging to BAME groups. Why does this matter? What difference does it make what colour, nationality, race or religion a judge is as long as they are fair, impartial and objective?
These are questions which we, as barristers of colour, are often challenged with. The simple answer is that diversity matters. It is an inherent good. Andrew Langdon QC, then Leader of the Western Circuit, raised this as a key issue seven years ago, when responding to proposed cuts to legal aid. If you would like to see the video we made please do view this link.
If the people appointed to judge our fellow citizens are derived solely from a narrow pool of public school educated, white men, what is the nature of justice dispensed? We make clear at the outset that being a white, privately educated man does not and should not render you an unfair judge.
However, if the judiciary in an entire area of the country is drawn from such a narrow pool there is a danger that no one is present to explain the cultural nuances, the various facets of human experience which fall outside the narrow frame of reference of that pool.
Courts hearing criminal cases require an understanding of human nature – an ability to communicate with, understand and be understood by ordinary members of the public from every background is truly crucial. It becomes even more important when sentencing data reveals disparities in sentencing for BAME defendants… which brings us back to the oft-asked question – why does it matter?
It matters because justice has to be done and justice has to be seen to be done. A truly representative judiciary acts as a check against justice being dispensed through the lens of a privately educated, white male gaze.
The Western Circuit Women’s Forum (WCWF) has undertaken some excellent work in the last few years in understanding why there has been low female retention at the Bar and has made considerable effort in encouraging more women to apply to be silks and judges. However, it is widely accepted that there is a shocking lack of ethnic diversity on Circuit. We recognise that we are far behind metropolitan cities and other regions in cultivating barristers from non-traditional backgrounds. Most of our barristers still hail from privately educated institutions and we can count on one hand the number of Black barristers.
In the autumn of 2019 a group of barristers, encouraged by the Leader of the Western Circuit, Kate Brunner QC, realised that if we wanted change, we would need to lead with solutions and BarNone was formed.
BarNone is comprised of a steering group of barristers across the Western Circuit, from Devon to Winchester, Portsmouth to Bristol who practise in all areas of the law and encompass every level of call. Our aim is to encourage applications from underrepresented groups with a particular focus upon those from state school and BAME backgrounds through the process of education, mentoring and outreach work.
The response has been terrific. All major sets on Circuit have signed up to our initiative to award at least 50% of mini pupillages to those from state school or BAME backgrounds. At our launch event, the Recorder of Bristol, HHJ Blair QC, spoke of the need for BAME judges and stated ‘this is not an acceptable face of justice in a city like Bristol’.
If you are thinking about a career at the Bar but feel that it isn’t for people like you, take a second look. If you take that second look and are worried when no one looks like you, read this and take heart. We live in a time when the most senior in our professions welcome you and admire your efforts to get to where you want and deserve to be, no matter your background. Go on Twitter (@BarNone2020), LinkedIn (BarNone) and Instagram (_barnone_) to read the stories of our steering group and beyond – we are here, we are successful and we are welcoming you with open arms.
To find out how to get involved please contact Anjali Gohil via: BarNone@westerncircuit.co.uk.
Sunyana Sharma is an inquest and professional discipline barrister at 3PB Barristers. She is a member of the steering group for BarNone and sits as an Assistant Coroner in Hampshire and as a DDJ in civil and family.
‘What is an acceptable face of justice?’ asked Marvin Rees, Bristol’s Mayor at BarNone’s launch event on 23 July 2020. It is a question, on the Western Circuit, that we have started to ask ourselves.
For us it is notable that no full-time circuit judge on the Western Circuit appears to be from an ethnic minority. Let’s break this down – there are 12 crown court centres on the Western Circuit, comprised of between one to eight full-time judges. All are white. Each of the resident judges is white and male.
At Bristol Crown Court alone there are eight full-time circuit judges, all of whom are white men. Meanwhile, according to city council data, 16% of the population of Bristol is Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic (BAME) with 28% of Bristol’s 0 to 5 year olds belonging to BAME groups. Why does this matter? What difference does it make what colour, nationality, race or religion a judge is as long as they are fair, impartial and objective?
These are questions which we, as barristers of colour, are often challenged with. The simple answer is that diversity matters. It is an inherent good. Andrew Langdon QC, then Leader of the Western Circuit, raised this as a key issue seven years ago, when responding to proposed cuts to legal aid. If you would like to see the video we made please do view this link.
If the people appointed to judge our fellow citizens are derived solely from a narrow pool of public school educated, white men, what is the nature of justice dispensed? We make clear at the outset that being a white, privately educated man does not and should not render you an unfair judge.
However, if the judiciary in an entire area of the country is drawn from such a narrow pool there is a danger that no one is present to explain the cultural nuances, the various facets of human experience which fall outside the narrow frame of reference of that pool.
Courts hearing criminal cases require an understanding of human nature – an ability to communicate with, understand and be understood by ordinary members of the public from every background is truly crucial. It becomes even more important when sentencing data reveals disparities in sentencing for BAME defendants… which brings us back to the oft-asked question – why does it matter?
It matters because justice has to be done and justice has to be seen to be done. A truly representative judiciary acts as a check against justice being dispensed through the lens of a privately educated, white male gaze.
The Western Circuit Women’s Forum (WCWF) has undertaken some excellent work in the last few years in understanding why there has been low female retention at the Bar and has made considerable effort in encouraging more women to apply to be silks and judges. However, it is widely accepted that there is a shocking lack of ethnic diversity on Circuit. We recognise that we are far behind metropolitan cities and other regions in cultivating barristers from non-traditional backgrounds. Most of our barristers still hail from privately educated institutions and we can count on one hand the number of Black barristers.
In the autumn of 2019 a group of barristers, encouraged by the Leader of the Western Circuit, Kate Brunner QC, realised that if we wanted change, we would need to lead with solutions and BarNone was formed.
BarNone is comprised of a steering group of barristers across the Western Circuit, from Devon to Winchester, Portsmouth to Bristol who practise in all areas of the law and encompass every level of call. Our aim is to encourage applications from underrepresented groups with a particular focus upon those from state school and BAME backgrounds through the process of education, mentoring and outreach work.
The response has been terrific. All major sets on Circuit have signed up to our initiative to award at least 50% of mini pupillages to those from state school or BAME backgrounds. At our launch event, the Recorder of Bristol, HHJ Blair QC, spoke of the need for BAME judges and stated ‘this is not an acceptable face of justice in a city like Bristol’.
If you are thinking about a career at the Bar but feel that it isn’t for people like you, take a second look. If you take that second look and are worried when no one looks like you, read this and take heart. We live in a time when the most senior in our professions welcome you and admire your efforts to get to where you want and deserve to be, no matter your background. Go on Twitter (@BarNone2020), LinkedIn (BarNone) and Instagram (_barnone_) to read the stories of our steering group and beyond – we are here, we are successful and we are welcoming you with open arms.
To find out how to get involved please contact Anjali Gohil via: BarNone@westerncircuit.co.uk.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Leah Arthur, a pupil, and her second seat supervisor, John Goss, share their perspectives on building a productive pupil-supervisor relationship
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
