*/
Solicitors should explain their reasons for recommending a particular advocate and sign a declaration that they have explained the choices available to their lay client, the Bar Council has said.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s consultation Preserving and Enhancing the Quality of Criminal Advocacy, the Bar backed plans for a referral fee ban and urged the Government to outlaw all inducements. The only consideration, it said, should be the quality of the advocate.
It also called for a Solicitor Regulation Authority-style reporting service through which advocates and others could confidentially report referral fee breaches.
Former Bar Chairman, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: ‘It is a matter of principle that public funds provided to pay for advocacy services should not be used to pay for kickbacks.’
The Bar Council supported the Government’s proposal for a criminal defence advocacy panel, loosely based on the Crown Prosecution Service model, so long as safeguards are put in place to ensure it operates effectively and is independent of government.
It also backed calls for solicitors to sign a declaration confirming that clients have been fully informed about the choice of advocate available to them, and suggested that solicitors provide a ‘brief explanation’ of why the type of advocate has been recommended and obtain signed confirmation that their clients have been advised of their right to choose, in plain and clear language.
MacDonald said: ‘Any declaration must require a litigator’s signature. There are serious contractual and professional consequences if a litigator is found to have lied on a signed declaration. This can’t be a tick box exercise.’
However, the Bar Council did not support the proposal to prevent solicitors from instructing advocates employed in their own firms, so long as they were the best person available to conduct the advocacy in a particular case – a proposal that the Law Society also slammed.
Solicitors should explain their reasons for recommending a particular advocate and sign a declaration that they have explained the choices available to their lay client, the Bar Council has said.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s consultation Preserving and Enhancing the Quality of Criminal Advocacy, the Bar backed plans for a referral fee ban and urged the Government to outlaw all inducements. The only consideration, it said, should be the quality of the advocate.
It also called for a Solicitor Regulation Authority-style reporting service through which advocates and others could confidentially report referral fee breaches.
Former Bar Chairman, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: ‘It is a matter of principle that public funds provided to pay for advocacy services should not be used to pay for kickbacks.’
The Bar Council supported the Government’s proposal for a criminal defence advocacy panel, loosely based on the Crown Prosecution Service model, so long as safeguards are put in place to ensure it operates effectively and is independent of government.
It also backed calls for solicitors to sign a declaration confirming that clients have been fully informed about the choice of advocate available to them, and suggested that solicitors provide a ‘brief explanation’ of why the type of advocate has been recommended and obtain signed confirmation that their clients have been advised of their right to choose, in plain and clear language.
MacDonald said: ‘Any declaration must require a litigator’s signature. There are serious contractual and professional consequences if a litigator is found to have lied on a signed declaration. This can’t be a tick box exercise.’
However, the Bar Council did not support the proposal to prevent solicitors from instructing advocates employed in their own firms, so long as they were the best person available to conduct the advocacy in a particular case – a proposal that the Law Society also slammed.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
