*/
THE Bar Council, the Approved Regulator for barristers in England and Wales, has begun a three-month consultation on new terms of engagement of barristers for solicitors. The move comes as the profession looks to update the current basis on which barristers take instructions from solicitors, which is viewed as outdated and unsatisfactory.
The new terms, drawn up by the Bar Council’s Implementation Committee, are intended to be transparent and enforceable, and to provide more protection to barristers (particularly young barristers) in countering unacceptable delays in payments. The consultation is being carried out with members of the Bar and a number of interested bodies, including the Approved Regulators of lawyers practising in England and Wales.
The move to adopt enforceable contract terms is consistent with the liberalisation of the legal services market and forms a part of the Bar Council’s modernisation agenda. Traditionally barristers take instructions from solicitors on the Terms of Work on which Barristers offer their Services to Solicitors and the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme 1988 (as amended). They fail to address the need for clarity in relation
to the professional obligations of barristers and solicitors to each other and to the lay client, and lack an effective method of enforcement of those obligations and rights.
The Bar Council's Implementation Committee has addressed these shortcomings and drawn up new contractual terms to replace the existing Terms of Work and abolish the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme. Whilst barristers and solicitors will continue to be free to agree any terms, it is envisaged that these new contractual terms will be used wherever alternative terms have not been agreed. The new terms would apply only to privately– funded matters or where the solicitors would pay counsel direct. However, the consultation is of interest to practitioners of publicly-funded work as it is proposed that the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme be replaced by an advisory List of Defaulting Solicitors scheme. It is envisaged that the List of Defaulting Solicitors would not only apply to solicitors who defaulted on payment of privately-funded matters but also to those who failed to carry out their obligations to ensure barristers are paid in respect of publicly-funded matters.
Commenting on the consultation, Sarah Asplin QC, Chairman of the Implementation Committee, said:
"The present system is outdated and is a barrier to entry to the Bar of those from less advantaged backgrounds who can ill afford unacceptable delays in payment and write off significant amounts of fees due to lack of an effective enforcement process.
It is in the interest of all involved in the administration of justice that the terms on which barristers are instructed by solicitors are transparent and enforceable. Clarifying and enabling the enforcement of rights and duties of both barristers and solicitors can only be beneficial to any client needing access to justice and I believe these new Terms meet this need".
The new terms, drawn up by the Bar Council’s Implementation Committee, are intended to be transparent and enforceable, and to provide more protection to barristers (particularly young barristers) in countering unacceptable delays in payments. The consultation is being carried out with members of the Bar and a number of interested bodies, including the Approved Regulators of lawyers practising in England and Wales.
The move to adopt enforceable contract terms is consistent with the liberalisation of the legal services market and forms a part of the Bar Council’s modernisation agenda. Traditionally barristers take instructions from solicitors on the Terms of Work on which Barristers offer their Services to Solicitors and the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme 1988 (as amended). They fail to address the need for clarity in relation
to the professional obligations of barristers and solicitors to each other and to the lay client, and lack an effective method of enforcement of those obligations and rights.
The Bar Council's Implementation Committee has addressed these shortcomings and drawn up new contractual terms to replace the existing Terms of Work and abolish the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme. Whilst barristers and solicitors will continue to be free to agree any terms, it is envisaged that these new contractual terms will be used wherever alternative terms have not been agreed. The new terms would apply only to privately– funded matters or where the solicitors would pay counsel direct. However, the consultation is of interest to practitioners of publicly-funded work as it is proposed that the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme be replaced by an advisory List of Defaulting Solicitors scheme. It is envisaged that the List of Defaulting Solicitors would not only apply to solicitors who defaulted on payment of privately-funded matters but also to those who failed to carry out their obligations to ensure barristers are paid in respect of publicly-funded matters.
Commenting on the consultation, Sarah Asplin QC, Chairman of the Implementation Committee, said:
"The present system is outdated and is a barrier to entry to the Bar of those from less advantaged backgrounds who can ill afford unacceptable delays in payment and write off significant amounts of fees due to lack of an effective enforcement process.
It is in the interest of all involved in the administration of justice that the terms on which barristers are instructed by solicitors are transparent and enforceable. Clarifying and enabling the enforcement of rights and duties of both barristers and solicitors can only be beneficial to any client needing access to justice and I believe these new Terms meet this need".
THE Bar Council, the Approved Regulator for barristers in England and Wales, has begun a three-month consultation on new terms of engagement of barristers for solicitors. The move comes as the profession looks to update the current basis on which barristers take instructions from solicitors, which is viewed as outdated and unsatisfactory.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
In an era of patient-centred care and growing concern over misconduct in medical settings, why do women still lack the right to choose women consultants for examination and treatment? Charles Davey investigates
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
