*/
THE Bar Council, the Approved Regulator for barristers in England and Wales, has begun a three-month consultation on new terms of engagement of barristers for solicitors. The move comes as the profession looks to update the current basis on which barristers take instructions from solicitors, which is viewed as outdated and unsatisfactory.
The new terms, drawn up by the Bar Council’s Implementation Committee, are intended to be transparent and enforceable, and to provide more protection to barristers (particularly young barristers) in countering unacceptable delays in payments. The consultation is being carried out with members of the Bar and a number of interested bodies, including the Approved Regulators of lawyers practising in England and Wales.
The move to adopt enforceable contract terms is consistent with the liberalisation of the legal services market and forms a part of the Bar Council’s modernisation agenda. Traditionally barristers take instructions from solicitors on the Terms of Work on which Barristers offer their Services to Solicitors and the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme 1988 (as amended). They fail to address the need for clarity in relation
to the professional obligations of barristers and solicitors to each other and to the lay client, and lack an effective method of enforcement of those obligations and rights.
The Bar Council's Implementation Committee has addressed these shortcomings and drawn up new contractual terms to replace the existing Terms of Work and abolish the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme. Whilst barristers and solicitors will continue to be free to agree any terms, it is envisaged that these new contractual terms will be used wherever alternative terms have not been agreed. The new terms would apply only to privately– funded matters or where the solicitors would pay counsel direct. However, the consultation is of interest to practitioners of publicly-funded work as it is proposed that the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme be replaced by an advisory List of Defaulting Solicitors scheme. It is envisaged that the List of Defaulting Solicitors would not only apply to solicitors who defaulted on payment of privately-funded matters but also to those who failed to carry out their obligations to ensure barristers are paid in respect of publicly-funded matters.
Commenting on the consultation, Sarah Asplin QC, Chairman of the Implementation Committee, said:
"The present system is outdated and is a barrier to entry to the Bar of those from less advantaged backgrounds who can ill afford unacceptable delays in payment and write off significant amounts of fees due to lack of an effective enforcement process.
It is in the interest of all involved in the administration of justice that the terms on which barristers are instructed by solicitors are transparent and enforceable. Clarifying and enabling the enforcement of rights and duties of both barristers and solicitors can only be beneficial to any client needing access to justice and I believe these new Terms meet this need".
The new terms, drawn up by the Bar Council’s Implementation Committee, are intended to be transparent and enforceable, and to provide more protection to barristers (particularly young barristers) in countering unacceptable delays in payments. The consultation is being carried out with members of the Bar and a number of interested bodies, including the Approved Regulators of lawyers practising in England and Wales.
The move to adopt enforceable contract terms is consistent with the liberalisation of the legal services market and forms a part of the Bar Council’s modernisation agenda. Traditionally barristers take instructions from solicitors on the Terms of Work on which Barristers offer their Services to Solicitors and the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme 1988 (as amended). They fail to address the need for clarity in relation
to the professional obligations of barristers and solicitors to each other and to the lay client, and lack an effective method of enforcement of those obligations and rights.
The Bar Council's Implementation Committee has addressed these shortcomings and drawn up new contractual terms to replace the existing Terms of Work and abolish the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme. Whilst barristers and solicitors will continue to be free to agree any terms, it is envisaged that these new contractual terms will be used wherever alternative terms have not been agreed. The new terms would apply only to privately– funded matters or where the solicitors would pay counsel direct. However, the consultation is of interest to practitioners of publicly-funded work as it is proposed that the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme be replaced by an advisory List of Defaulting Solicitors scheme. It is envisaged that the List of Defaulting Solicitors would not only apply to solicitors who defaulted on payment of privately-funded matters but also to those who failed to carry out their obligations to ensure barristers are paid in respect of publicly-funded matters.
Commenting on the consultation, Sarah Asplin QC, Chairman of the Implementation Committee, said:
"The present system is outdated and is a barrier to entry to the Bar of those from less advantaged backgrounds who can ill afford unacceptable delays in payment and write off significant amounts of fees due to lack of an effective enforcement process.
It is in the interest of all involved in the administration of justice that the terms on which barristers are instructed by solicitors are transparent and enforceable. Clarifying and enabling the enforcement of rights and duties of both barristers and solicitors can only be beneficial to any client needing access to justice and I believe these new Terms meet this need".
THE Bar Council, the Approved Regulator for barristers in England and Wales, has begun a three-month consultation on new terms of engagement of barristers for solicitors. The move comes as the profession looks to update the current basis on which barristers take instructions from solicitors, which is viewed as outdated and unsatisfactory.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
