*/
“The truth is that publicly perceived and generally accepted social and moral standards change, and, within limits, the legislature and the courts must reflect those changes, if they are to retain democratic relevance and public confidence”, said the new Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, at the 2009 Denning Lecture.
Speaking on the topic of “Rights and Responsibilities: Civic Duty and the Rule of Law”, Lord Neuberger stressed the importance of performing a balancing act. “What a sixty years it has been”, he noted since Lord Denning himself defined freedom in 1949 as “the freedom of every law-abiding citizen to think what he will, to say what he will, and to go where he will on his lawful occasion without let or hindrance from other persons”.
Lord Neuberger stated that there are “immutable” values although it is impossible to be didactic or precise as to the extent of these core values. He however was able to name several. Chief amongst rights and responsibilities are the right of a fair trial as a “substantive, free standing right”, the right to liberty and security (including the “right to privacy” which the courts have shoe-horned into the law of confidence), and freedom of expression, which is “the means by which truth is told to power”. Rights and responsibilities though need respect (“the more we think of them as being well established, the greater the danger of our taking them for granted”). “Human rights may have a long history,” he noted “but their universal acceptance remains an ongoing project”. It is here that the judiciary and politicians have to strike a balance between rights and responsibilities—how to balance one right against another, how to balance a right against its “internal limits” and how to balance it against an overarching need to protect the very life of the nation”.
He recognised that the courts have double duties, eg not only not to act inconsistently with the right to a fair trial but also positively to secure a fair trial. He concluded by endorsing the views of his famous predecessor that when the interests of freedom are “nicely balanced” against the duties which restrict them, “the scale goes down on the side of freedom”.
The 2009 Denning Lecture was given at a BACFI meeting on 23 November 2009.
Lord Neuberger stated that there are “immutable” values although it is impossible to be didactic or precise as to the extent of these core values. He however was able to name several. Chief amongst rights and responsibilities are the right of a fair trial as a “substantive, free standing right”, the right to liberty and security (including the “right to privacy” which the courts have shoe-horned into the law of confidence), and freedom of expression, which is “the means by which truth is told to power”. Rights and responsibilities though need respect (“the more we think of them as being well established, the greater the danger of our taking them for granted”). “Human rights may have a long history,” he noted “but their universal acceptance remains an ongoing project”. It is here that the judiciary and politicians have to strike a balance between rights and responsibilities—how to balance one right against another, how to balance a right against its “internal limits” and how to balance it against an overarching need to protect the very life of the nation”.
He recognised that the courts have double duties, eg not only not to act inconsistently with the right to a fair trial but also positively to secure a fair trial. He concluded by endorsing the views of his famous predecessor that when the interests of freedom are “nicely balanced” against the duties which restrict them, “the scale goes down on the side of freedom”.
The 2009 Denning Lecture was given at a BACFI meeting on 23 November 2009.
“The truth is that publicly perceived and generally accepted social and moral standards change, and, within limits, the legislature and the courts must reflect those changes, if they are to retain democratic relevance and public confidence”, said the new Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, at the 2009 Denning Lecture.
Speaking on the topic of “Rights and Responsibilities: Civic Duty and the Rule of Law”, Lord Neuberger stressed the importance of performing a balancing act. “What a sixty years it has been”, he noted since Lord Denning himself defined freedom in 1949 as “the freedom of every law-abiding citizen to think what he will, to say what he will, and to go where he will on his lawful occasion without let or hindrance from other persons”.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
Responding to criticism on the narrow profile of government-instructed counsel, Mel Nebhrajani CB describes the system-wide change at GLD to drive fairer distribution of work and broader development of talent
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
