*/
In December 2020 BAILII, the British and Irish Legal Information Institute celebrated its 20th anniversary. We are looking forward to continuing and enhancing our services. The announcements by the Ministry of Justice and The National Archives in June this year about a planned new service for ‘important’ judgments and ‘cases of legal significance’ from England and Wales have caused some confusion about BAILII’s ongoing role. This article outlines BAILII’s historic contribution to facilitating access to justice and our future plans.
BAILII has long played a key role in the international movement calling for free access to law as means to promote the rule of law and access to justice. For many years, we have campaigned for the need to improve access to judgment data and the information flow by which it reaches the public through more comprehensive, speedy and structured judgment data for the benefit of all users. BAILII loads new judgments within hours of receipt. Usage is anonymous, requires no log on or registration, and there are no cookies, trackers or analytics.
We will continue to play our part in ensuring that free legal information services are seen to be appropriately independent. BAILII will remain an independent charity and the largest free internet provider of primary legal materials in the United Kingdom. We take very seriously our role in helping people to understand and use the law. We are determined not only to ensure that public access to case law from jurisdictions throughout the UK and Ireland is maintained, but also to develop our service to help users, and their lawyers and advisers, to interpret content.
In addition to continuing to publish all our current range of materials, BAILII has been working on plans to add valuable additional content.
An important development is our evolving initiative to provide access to high-quality fully indexed legal commentary and academic analysis alongside and interlinked with primary materials. We look forward to discussions with blog authors, legal commentators, and academic writers to offer them an additional route to share their insights and reach wider audiences as this project develops.
BAILII is also updating and enhancing its OpenLaw service, liaising with academic specialists, to support legal education. The service identifies and links to judgments of leading cases by topic for law students. These judgments will include nutshell descriptions to assist in understanding at a glance the significance of the cases. An example is the updated list for torts. The project was originally funded by JISC, at the time the Joint Information Systems Committee of the Higher Education Funding Council, and continues with the assistance of the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS).
Part of our mandate is a commitment to support research in legal information. We sponsor an annual lecture by leading members of the judiciary and eminent academic lawyers, most recently Professor Richard Susskind. BAILII is also collaborating with an Oxford University research project team investigating the implications of AI for law. We expect that the findings of the research will assist MOJ/HMCTS and BAILII build robust data governance structures and inform future decisions on how data might be shared for AI applications and under what conditions.
The forthcoming creation of a government archive for data analysis and for future generations is a major step forward for England and Wales. It is one for which BAILII has long advocated and is actively supporting, while maintaining all of our own content and services.
Currently, judgments in England and Wales are distributed directly by judges to interested parties including publishers. The addition of a new publisher of judgments is always welcome but BAILII hopes that this new role for The National Archives will not reduce the range of recipients of this direct distribution, or adversely affect the speed or selection of cases made available for publication. This would compromise both independence and access to the law.
BAILII is grateful to all its stakeholders, including the Bar and the legal community more widely, for their continuing support for our free, easily accessible and independent service – and one we plan to enhance further still.
Jules Winterton is part-time CEO of BAILII (www.bailii.org). He was formerly Director of the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London, and was a BAILII Trustee in its early years.
In December 2020 BAILII, the British and Irish Legal Information Institute celebrated its 20th anniversary. We are looking forward to continuing and enhancing our services. The announcements by the Ministry of Justice and The National Archives in June this year about a planned new service for ‘important’ judgments and ‘cases of legal significance’ from England and Wales have caused some confusion about BAILII’s ongoing role. This article outlines BAILII’s historic contribution to facilitating access to justice and our future plans.
BAILII has long played a key role in the international movement calling for free access to law as means to promote the rule of law and access to justice. For many years, we have campaigned for the need to improve access to judgment data and the information flow by which it reaches the public through more comprehensive, speedy and structured judgment data for the benefit of all users. BAILII loads new judgments within hours of receipt. Usage is anonymous, requires no log on or registration, and there are no cookies, trackers or analytics.
We will continue to play our part in ensuring that free legal information services are seen to be appropriately independent. BAILII will remain an independent charity and the largest free internet provider of primary legal materials in the United Kingdom. We take very seriously our role in helping people to understand and use the law. We are determined not only to ensure that public access to case law from jurisdictions throughout the UK and Ireland is maintained, but also to develop our service to help users, and their lawyers and advisers, to interpret content.
In addition to continuing to publish all our current range of materials, BAILII has been working on plans to add valuable additional content.
An important development is our evolving initiative to provide access to high-quality fully indexed legal commentary and academic analysis alongside and interlinked with primary materials. We look forward to discussions with blog authors, legal commentators, and academic writers to offer them an additional route to share their insights and reach wider audiences as this project develops.
BAILII is also updating and enhancing its OpenLaw service, liaising with academic specialists, to support legal education. The service identifies and links to judgments of leading cases by topic for law students. These judgments will include nutshell descriptions to assist in understanding at a glance the significance of the cases. An example is the updated list for torts. The project was originally funded by JISC, at the time the Joint Information Systems Committee of the Higher Education Funding Council, and continues with the assistance of the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS).
Part of our mandate is a commitment to support research in legal information. We sponsor an annual lecture by leading members of the judiciary and eminent academic lawyers, most recently Professor Richard Susskind. BAILII is also collaborating with an Oxford University research project team investigating the implications of AI for law. We expect that the findings of the research will assist MOJ/HMCTS and BAILII build robust data governance structures and inform future decisions on how data might be shared for AI applications and under what conditions.
The forthcoming creation of a government archive for data analysis and for future generations is a major step forward for England and Wales. It is one for which BAILII has long advocated and is actively supporting, while maintaining all of our own content and services.
Currently, judgments in England and Wales are distributed directly by judges to interested parties including publishers. The addition of a new publisher of judgments is always welcome but BAILII hopes that this new role for The National Archives will not reduce the range of recipients of this direct distribution, or adversely affect the speed or selection of cases made available for publication. This would compromise both independence and access to the law.
BAILII is grateful to all its stakeholders, including the Bar and the legal community more widely, for their continuing support for our free, easily accessible and independent service – and one we plan to enhance further still.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
On the 50th anniversary of the pub bombings, even now it is still unresolved. Chris Mullin, the journalist and former MP who led the campaign leading to the release of the Birmingham Six, looks back at events
Adele Akers’ reflections on health and wellbeing support at the very junior end of the Bar
Not one to say, ‘I told you so,’ Sam Thomas continues his cyber series with the key learnings from the major supply chain attack affecting 80 law firms and at least one set of chambers at the end of 2023
One year on and the Court of Appeal fails to quash convictions after receiving evidence of racism in the jury room, and there are still no revisions to the Equal Treatment Bench Book , says Keir Monteith KC
Increasing sophistication and frequency of attacks have led many chambers to ask ‘when’ not ‘if’ they will suffer a cyber incident. Simon Davis sets out the factors to consider when renewing your cyber cover
