*/
On the 31 January 2013, the commonly used terms of engagement for barristers taking instructions from solicitors, namely the Terms of Work and the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme (in Annexe G1 and G2 of the Bar Code of Conduct) will be abolished. On the 31 January, the Bar Code of Conduct will be amended so that the Cab Rank Rule applies to instructions offered on the basis of new Contractual Terms or the barrister’s own published terms of engagement. This means that instead of the Cab Rank Rule applying to the present Terms of Work, it will apply to these new Contractual Terms or the barrister’s own published terms.
The new contractual Terms are for use for instructions from solicitors and all persons/bodies authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to carry out legal services under the Legal Services Act 2007. The Terms enable barristers to sue for unpaid fees and have been drafted for use in privately funded matters or matters where the barrister is not paid directly by the Legal Services Commission (LSC) or the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). The new Contractual Terms would only apply to Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) cases if the CFA incorporate these Terms.
The new Contractual Terms or the barrister’s own published terms will not become the “new” default terms. Default terms are no longer required as barristers/chambers are obliged to publish their normal terms of engagement under the Provision of Services Regulations 2009. Barristers will continue to be free to agree any terms or no terms or amend the new Contractual Terms.
The Withdrawal of Credit List will be abolished and, in its place, there will be a List of Defaulting Solicitors and other Authorised Persons. Another change to the Code will be that, instead of a barrister being forbidden to take instructions on credit from solicitors named on the Withdrawal of Credit List, the barrister will have the right under the Cab Rank Rule to refuse instructions on credit but, equally, can decide to accept instructions.
As a matter of urgency, barristers and chambers need to do the following:
1. Decide what terms to adopt as the normal terms of engagement, to be published or to be referenced on the chambers’ website. Publishing terms does not prevent barristers from agreeing alternative terms with clients as the need arises
2. Advise existing solicitor clients of any intended change in terms, and
3. Review acceptance of instruction letters and website to ensure that they refer to any revised terms of engagement.
The new Standard Terms changes to the Code of Conduct can be found on the Bar Council’s website under http://bit.ly/ RKu3Jd. The Guide on using the new Standard Terms can also be found on the Bar Council’s website.
For further information or clarification, please contact Janice Marshall, Implementation Committee Secretariat at the Bar Council on: 020 7611 1375 / JMarshall@BarCouncil.org.uk.
The new contractual Terms are for use for instructions from solicitors and all persons/bodies authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to carry out legal services under the Legal Services Act 2007. The Terms enable barristers to sue for unpaid fees and have been drafted for use in privately funded matters or matters where the barrister is not paid directly by the Legal Services Commission (LSC) or the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). The new Contractual Terms would only apply to Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) cases if the CFA incorporate these Terms.
The new Contractual Terms or the barrister’s own published terms will not become the “new” default terms. Default terms are no longer required as barristers/chambers are obliged to publish their normal terms of engagement under the Provision of Services Regulations 2009. Barristers will continue to be free to agree any terms or no terms or amend the new Contractual Terms.
The Withdrawal of Credit List will be abolished and, in its place, there will be a List of Defaulting Solicitors and other Authorised Persons. Another change to the Code will be that, instead of a barrister being forbidden to take instructions on credit from solicitors named on the Withdrawal of Credit List, the barrister will have the right under the Cab Rank Rule to refuse instructions on credit but, equally, can decide to accept instructions.
As a matter of urgency, barristers and chambers need to do the following:
1. Decide what terms to adopt as the normal terms of engagement, to be published or to be referenced on the chambers’ website. Publishing terms does not prevent barristers from agreeing alternative terms with clients as the need arises
2. Advise existing solicitor clients of any intended change in terms, and
3. Review acceptance of instruction letters and website to ensure that they refer to any revised terms of engagement.
The new Standard Terms changes to the Code of Conduct can be found on the Bar Council’s website under http://bit.ly/ RKu3Jd. The Guide on using the new Standard Terms can also be found on the Bar Council’s website.
For further information or clarification, please contact Janice Marshall, Implementation Committee Secretariat at the Bar Council on: 020 7611 1375 / JMarshall@BarCouncil.org.uk.
On the 31 January 2013, the commonly used terms of engagement for barristers taking instructions from solicitors, namely the Terms of Work and the Withdrawal of Credit Scheme (in Annexe G1 and G2 of the Bar Code of Conduct) will be abolished. On the 31 January, the Bar Code of Conduct will be amended so that the Cab Rank Rule applies to instructions offered on the basis of new Contractual Terms or the barrister’s own published terms of engagement. This means that instead of the Cab Rank Rule applying to the present Terms of Work, it will apply to these new Contractual Terms or the barrister’s own published terms.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
