*/
Guidance to help prosecution witnesses prepare for trial may ‘damage’ conviction prospects and ‘reduce the efficient use of court time’, the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has warned.
National rollout of the new Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) procedure, under which prosecution barristers must explain the court process to witnesses, started on 27 June.
It follows testing in Sheffield, Ipswich, Liverpool and Teeside, which the CPS said had ‘gone well’, with 89.5% of witnesses saying they were satisfied or fairly satisfied with the support they received.
The document, Speaking to witnesses at court: CPS guidance, set out the role played by prosecutors to ensure witnesses ‘give their best evidence’.
Prosecutors must meet all witnesses before they give evidence and explain the court procedure, the purpose of giving evidence and cross examination and the general nature of the defence case.
They must not ‘provide the detail of, discuss or speculate’ on specific questions a witness may face or discuss with them how to answer the questions. The guidance stresses that crown court advocates must carry out such conversations with a member of CPS staff present.
CBA chair, Mark Fenhalls QC, said that while ‘much of the guidance is sensible and appropriate’, he had ‘significant reservations’ about parts that ‘may damage the prospects of securing convictions’ and ‘actively reduce the efficient use of court time’.
‘For better or worse,’ he said, the guidance is part of barristers’ instructions, and warned them to ‘approach it with caution’ and report problems to the CBA.
Guidance to help prosecution witnesses prepare for trial may ‘damage’ conviction prospects and ‘reduce the efficient use of court time’, the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has warned.
National rollout of the new Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) procedure, under which prosecution barristers must explain the court process to witnesses, started on 27 June.
It follows testing in Sheffield, Ipswich, Liverpool and Teeside, which the CPS said had ‘gone well’, with 89.5% of witnesses saying they were satisfied or fairly satisfied with the support they received.
The document, Speaking to witnesses at court: CPS guidance, set out the role played by prosecutors to ensure witnesses ‘give their best evidence’.
Prosecutors must meet all witnesses before they give evidence and explain the court procedure, the purpose of giving evidence and cross examination and the general nature of the defence case.
They must not ‘provide the detail of, discuss or speculate’ on specific questions a witness may face or discuss with them how to answer the questions. The guidance stresses that crown court advocates must carry out such conversations with a member of CPS staff present.
CBA chair, Mark Fenhalls QC, said that while ‘much of the guidance is sensible and appropriate’, he had ‘significant reservations’ about parts that ‘may damage the prospects of securing convictions’ and ‘actively reduce the efficient use of court time’.
‘For better or worse,’ he said, the guidance is part of barristers’ instructions, and warned them to ‘approach it with caution’ and report problems to the CBA.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
In this wide-ranging interview, Professor Jo Delahunty KC, Family Law KC of the Year, talks to Anthony Inglese CB about the values that shaped her, the moment she found her vocation and, in an intensely personal call to arms, why time is running out for the legal aid Bar
Is the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office process fit for purpose? Women barristers’ experiences of bullying are not being reported or, if they are, they are not making it through the system, says Tana Adkin KC
Thomas Roe KC and Andrew O’Kola respond to an article by Dr Leonardo Raznovich (Counsel , October 2025) – ‘Privy Council colonialism? Piercing the constitutional veil’
Chair of the Bar reports back
The client’s best interests could be well-served by sharing the advocacy with junior counsel more often than you might think – Naomi Cunningham and Charlotte Eves explore some less orthodox ways to divide the speaking role
