*/
The Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) has launched a monitoring scheme to help barristers conduct a regulatory compliance “health-check”.
Launched in October, the programme builds on a pilot monitoring scheme that took place in 2008 among 35 chambers. It has now been extended to all chambers and sole practitioners, and aims to help practitioners and chambers achieve compliance with the Bar’s Code of Conduct and other regulations.
A compulsory questionnaire has been sent to all chambers so the BSB can gain information on whether and how they comply with regulatory requirements.
Under the scheme, the BSB may visit chambers to get a feel for how the administration and management of chambers functions. Where non-compliance is identified, the BSB will ask chambers for suggestions on how it can be addressed and work with them to meet the standards required. The BSB emphasises that disciplinary action will be a last resort that will be taken only after attempts to assist chambers have failed.
Sam Stein QC, Chair of the BSB’s Quality Assurance Committee, and Oliver Hanmer, the BSB’s professional practice manager, said: “The monitoring scheme provides an opportunity for an independent ‘health check’ of chambers” procedures and processes and, where necessary, expert advice to be given on how these can be improved.
“At first blush, chambers monitoring may appear to be the BSB taking on the role of Big Brother, but the reality is different. The intention is not to catch chambers out but to ensure that they are complying with certain regulatory requirements and to give practical assistance where necessary.
“Good practice will be identified and shared across chambers and non-compliant chambers will be given every opportunity and assistance to address this.”
Once the monitoring process is underway, a kitemark may be developed, which chambers could use for marketing purposes.
This year’s monitoring programme will focus on four areas: chambers complaints handling; pupillage; equality and diversity; and compliance with the Money Laundering Regulations 2007.
A compulsory questionnaire has been sent to all chambers so the BSB can gain information on whether and how they comply with regulatory requirements.
Under the scheme, the BSB may visit chambers to get a feel for how the administration and management of chambers functions. Where non-compliance is identified, the BSB will ask chambers for suggestions on how it can be addressed and work with them to meet the standards required. The BSB emphasises that disciplinary action will be a last resort that will be taken only after attempts to assist chambers have failed.
Sam Stein QC, Chair of the BSB’s Quality Assurance Committee, and Oliver Hanmer, the BSB’s professional practice manager, said: “The monitoring scheme provides an opportunity for an independent ‘health check’ of chambers” procedures and processes and, where necessary, expert advice to be given on how these can be improved.
“At first blush, chambers monitoring may appear to be the BSB taking on the role of Big Brother, but the reality is different. The intention is not to catch chambers out but to ensure that they are complying with certain regulatory requirements and to give practical assistance where necessary.
“Good practice will be identified and shared across chambers and non-compliant chambers will be given every opportunity and assistance to address this.”
Once the monitoring process is underway, a kitemark may be developed, which chambers could use for marketing purposes.
This year’s monitoring programme will focus on four areas: chambers complaints handling; pupillage; equality and diversity; and compliance with the Money Laundering Regulations 2007.
The Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) has launched a monitoring scheme to help barristers conduct a regulatory compliance “health-check”.
Launched in October, the programme builds on a pilot monitoring scheme that took place in 2008 among 35 chambers. It has now been extended to all chambers and sole practitioners, and aims to help practitioners and chambers achieve compliance with the Bar’s Code of Conduct and other regulations.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
