*/
The Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) has launched a monitoring scheme to help barristers conduct a regulatory compliance “health-check”.
Launched in October, the programme builds on a pilot monitoring scheme that took place in 2008 among 35 chambers. It has now been extended to all chambers and sole practitioners, and aims to help practitioners and chambers achieve compliance with the Bar’s Code of Conduct and other regulations.
A compulsory questionnaire has been sent to all chambers so the BSB can gain information on whether and how they comply with regulatory requirements.
Under the scheme, the BSB may visit chambers to get a feel for how the administration and management of chambers functions. Where non-compliance is identified, the BSB will ask chambers for suggestions on how it can be addressed and work with them to meet the standards required. The BSB emphasises that disciplinary action will be a last resort that will be taken only after attempts to assist chambers have failed.
Sam Stein QC, Chair of the BSB’s Quality Assurance Committee, and Oliver Hanmer, the BSB’s professional practice manager, said: “The monitoring scheme provides an opportunity for an independent ‘health check’ of chambers” procedures and processes and, where necessary, expert advice to be given on how these can be improved.
“At first blush, chambers monitoring may appear to be the BSB taking on the role of Big Brother, but the reality is different. The intention is not to catch chambers out but to ensure that they are complying with certain regulatory requirements and to give practical assistance where necessary.
“Good practice will be identified and shared across chambers and non-compliant chambers will be given every opportunity and assistance to address this.”
Once the monitoring process is underway, a kitemark may be developed, which chambers could use for marketing purposes.
This year’s monitoring programme will focus on four areas: chambers complaints handling; pupillage; equality and diversity; and compliance with the Money Laundering Regulations 2007.
A compulsory questionnaire has been sent to all chambers so the BSB can gain information on whether and how they comply with regulatory requirements.
Under the scheme, the BSB may visit chambers to get a feel for how the administration and management of chambers functions. Where non-compliance is identified, the BSB will ask chambers for suggestions on how it can be addressed and work with them to meet the standards required. The BSB emphasises that disciplinary action will be a last resort that will be taken only after attempts to assist chambers have failed.
Sam Stein QC, Chair of the BSB’s Quality Assurance Committee, and Oliver Hanmer, the BSB’s professional practice manager, said: “The monitoring scheme provides an opportunity for an independent ‘health check’ of chambers” procedures and processes and, where necessary, expert advice to be given on how these can be improved.
“At first blush, chambers monitoring may appear to be the BSB taking on the role of Big Brother, but the reality is different. The intention is not to catch chambers out but to ensure that they are complying with certain regulatory requirements and to give practical assistance where necessary.
“Good practice will be identified and shared across chambers and non-compliant chambers will be given every opportunity and assistance to address this.”
Once the monitoring process is underway, a kitemark may be developed, which chambers could use for marketing purposes.
This year’s monitoring programme will focus on four areas: chambers complaints handling; pupillage; equality and diversity; and compliance with the Money Laundering Regulations 2007.
The Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) has launched a monitoring scheme to help barristers conduct a regulatory compliance “health-check”.
Launched in October, the programme builds on a pilot monitoring scheme that took place in 2008 among 35 chambers. It has now been extended to all chambers and sole practitioners, and aims to help practitioners and chambers achieve compliance with the Bar’s Code of Conduct and other regulations.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Jemima Coleman and Zoë Leventhal KC on the evolving global movement seeking to reframe how we view nature: to recognise that nature possesses inherent rights and to enshrine these rights in law
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
