*/
A coalition of legal and campaigning groups published a Manifesto for Justice seeking to put access to justice at the top of the election agenda.
Produced by organisations including the Bar Council, the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, the Law Centres Network, AdviceUK and the Legal Action Group, it puts forward the case for an effective and efficient system of justice, which is accessible to all.
It calls on the next government to restore legal aid for those areas where the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 removed it, to protect the legal aid budget from further cuts and to scrap the recent changes to judicial review.
Bar Chairman, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: “Politicians think justice, in the broader sense, yields insufficient political capital. And why shouldn’t they?
“Voters have for years taken access to justice for granted as an immutable part of our heritage and the established order. But for how much longer will they so do?”
In the week that the three main political parties launched their manifestos, a YouGov poll indicated that the public is more concerned about access to justice than free healthcare.
Of the 2,022 respondents who took part in the online survey, 84% rated access to justice as a fundamental right, compared with 82% for healthcare.
The pressure mounted on parties to take the issue seriously. As Counsel went to press, solicitor groups planned a mass “Vote for Justice” rally in central London, while a satirical animation, entitled Legal Aid Team, hosted on the Guardian newspaper’s website sought to explain the importance of legal aid to the electorate.
Produced by organisations including the Bar Council, the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, the Law Centres Network, AdviceUK and the Legal Action Group, it puts forward the case for an effective and efficient system of justice, which is accessible to all.
It calls on the next government to restore legal aid for those areas where the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 removed it, to protect the legal aid budget from further cuts and to scrap the recent changes to judicial review.
Bar Chairman, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: “Politicians think justice, in the broader sense, yields insufficient political capital. And why shouldn’t they?
“Voters have for years taken access to justice for granted as an immutable part of our heritage and the established order. But for how much longer will they so do?”
In the week that the three main political parties launched their manifestos, a YouGov poll indicated that the public is more concerned about access to justice than free healthcare.
Of the 2,022 respondents who took part in the online survey, 84% rated access to justice as a fundamental right, compared with 82% for healthcare.
The pressure mounted on parties to take the issue seriously. As Counsel went to press, solicitor groups planned a mass “Vote for Justice” rally in central London, while a satirical animation, entitled Legal Aid Team, hosted on the Guardian newspaper’s website sought to explain the importance of legal aid to the electorate.
A coalition of legal and campaigning groups published a Manifesto for Justice seeking to put access to justice at the top of the election agenda.
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
If the Bar cannot define and prohibit bullying behaviour, what chance do we have of persuading the Judiciary to do so? Darren Howe QC and Professor Jo Delahunty QC's call to action on codification plus suggested strategies for dealing with bullying from the Bar and Bench
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Following the launch of the Life at the Young Bar report and a nationwide listening exercise, Michael Polak and Michael Harwood outline the Young Barristers Committees raft of initiatives designed to address your issues of concern
