*/
Criminal
Improvements in casework handling at the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) must continue if the SFO is to deliver on its new Director’s strategy, HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate has warned.
In his Report to the Attorney General on the inspection of the Serious Fraud Office, published in November 2012, HM Chief Inspector Michael Fuller QPM found “significant process failures and other weaknesses”.
The inspection relates almost exclusively to casework quality levels and systems under the previous SFO Director, Richard Alderman. Whilst the inspection did not examine the case of the Tchenguiz brothers, which was under judicial review at the time, the issues raised during proceedings were within scope.
Key risks include the need to control the balance and make-up of the SFO caseload more effectively, by improving the intelligence and case acceptance processes. Casework systems need to be streamlined and mandated, with a drive towards standardisation and proper documentary recording. Sound quality assurance needs to be embedded, with clear lines of accountability and responsibility.
“This is a critical time for the SFO,” notes the report, but there is “a window of opportunity, as the new Director has engendered new levels of confidence in staff and stakeholders alike”.
SFO Director David Green CB QC took up his appointment in April 2012 with an aim to bring the agency to the top of its game as an investigator and prosecutor of top tier, complex fraud and corruption. The report, prepared with a view to helping drive through the improvements, makes eight recommendations, all of which Green has accepted. Inspectors also noted strengths in digital evidence handling and victim and witness care.
On the Bar, inspectors agreed that the involvement of suitably experienced and skilled external counsel is essential to the SFO casework process, as long as they are “selected with care, and managed effectively”, but warned against over-use of counsel in key casework decisions and strategic decision-making. The lack of training, induction and performance management for external counsel was noted: “Many junior barristers struggle to integrate as a result, and this has a clear impact on the quality of their casework.”
Work has already begun to address the areas of concern, said the SFO, and Green’s management and organisational restructure is now complete. New General Counsel Alun Milford is to focus on internal guidance, assisting the case-work divisions pre-charge. Distinguished retired judge, HHJ Geoffrey Rivlin QC, with considerable fraud trials experience, has taken on the role of Special Advisor, looking at quality assurance. Other new roles include Head of Investigations, revising standards of good practice to ensure a common approach across all investigations, and a Head of Policy and External Engagement to focus on stakeholder relations. Recruitment drives aimed at the private Bar and solicitors are also under way to bring in new blood to the agency.
“The changes at the SFO do not mean that the role of outside counsel will be diminished, simply refocused to work within the new structure. The SFO will continue to rely on outside counsel to advise on case developments, assist with decisions and, obviously advocate at court and, where required, to provide one-off advice to the Director on case specific issues,” an SFO spokesman told Counsel.
In his Report to the Attorney General on the inspection of the Serious Fraud Office, published in November 2012, HM Chief Inspector Michael Fuller QPM found “significant process failures and other weaknesses”.
The inspection relates almost exclusively to casework quality levels and systems under the previous SFO Director, Richard Alderman. Whilst the inspection did not examine the case of the Tchenguiz brothers, which was under judicial review at the time, the issues raised during proceedings were within scope.
Key risks include the need to control the balance and make-up of the SFO caseload more effectively, by improving the intelligence and case acceptance processes. Casework systems need to be streamlined and mandated, with a drive towards standardisation and proper documentary recording. Sound quality assurance needs to be embedded, with clear lines of accountability and responsibility.
“This is a critical time for the SFO,” notes the report, but there is “a window of opportunity, as the new Director has engendered new levels of confidence in staff and stakeholders alike”.
SFO Director David Green CB QC took up his appointment in April 2012 with an aim to bring the agency to the top of its game as an investigator and prosecutor of top tier, complex fraud and corruption. The report, prepared with a view to helping drive through the improvements, makes eight recommendations, all of which Green has accepted. Inspectors also noted strengths in digital evidence handling and victim and witness care.
On the Bar, inspectors agreed that the involvement of suitably experienced and skilled external counsel is essential to the SFO casework process, as long as they are “selected with care, and managed effectively”, but warned against over-use of counsel in key casework decisions and strategic decision-making. The lack of training, induction and performance management for external counsel was noted: “Many junior barristers struggle to integrate as a result, and this has a clear impact on the quality of their casework.”
Work has already begun to address the areas of concern, said the SFO, and Green’s management and organisational restructure is now complete. New General Counsel Alun Milford is to focus on internal guidance, assisting the case-work divisions pre-charge. Distinguished retired judge, HHJ Geoffrey Rivlin QC, with considerable fraud trials experience, has taken on the role of Special Advisor, looking at quality assurance. Other new roles include Head of Investigations, revising standards of good practice to ensure a common approach across all investigations, and a Head of Policy and External Engagement to focus on stakeholder relations. Recruitment drives aimed at the private Bar and solicitors are also under way to bring in new blood to the agency.
“The changes at the SFO do not mean that the role of outside counsel will be diminished, simply refocused to work within the new structure. The SFO will continue to rely on outside counsel to advise on case developments, assist with decisions and, obviously advocate at court and, where required, to provide one-off advice to the Director on case specific issues,” an SFO spokesman told Counsel.
Criminal
Improvements in casework handling at the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) must continue if the SFO is to deliver on its new Director’s strategy, HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate has warned.
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
