R v Okoro (No 3)

Criminal law – Possession. The judge had not erred in his direction to the jury on the meaning of possession in relation to the extreme pornographic images found on the defendant's smartphone. Accordingly, the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, dismissed the defendant's appeal against conviction for possession of indecent photographs of a child contrary to s 160(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, and possession of extreme pornographic images contrary to s 63(1) of the Criminal justice and Immigration Act 2008.

Category: