Divorce – Financial provision. The Family Division dismissed the husband's appeal against a judge's order, which had varied a periodical payments order made some years previously in matrimonial financial remedy proceedings, and made a pension sharing order, which had not been made previously in the proceedings. The analysis carried out by the judge had been clear and comprehensive. On the evidence, the judge had been fully entitled to come to the decisions he had reached concerning the husband's current income and his potential earning capacity.