Bar responds to Jackson cost review E-mail
September 2009
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Referral fees lead to bad service and should not be permitted for barristers or other lawyers, while putting a limit on costs in advance is “neither necessary nor appropriate”, the Bar Council has said in its response to the Jackson review on the costs of civil litigation.
Claimants should continue to be able to recover 100 per cent of their damages award and should not see those damages reduced by unrecoverable but reasonably incurred costs, according to a Bar Council working group, chaired by Michael Todd QC, who led the response. The general rule that the loser pays the winner’s costs was “fair and effective”, the group concluded.
On case management, the group said there was no single approach that was appropriate and it was important instead to have a flexible system.

Please login/register to see full article
 
Labels: LitigationCivil

In this month’s issue…

Labels: LitigationCivil

counselmay2012frontpageRape Sentencing
Are the courts too soft on rapists?

Civil Justice Reform
An interview with Lord Justice Jackson

Legal professional privilege
Let the fightback begin


Subscribe now

William Byfield’s Secret E-Diary