*/
Thousands of cases were disrupted after the main court computer system went down at hundreds of courts across the country last month.
The chaos, during which trials were adjourned and hearings delayed, is an embarrassment for the Ministry of Justice, which is seeking to increase its use of online and digital hearings through its £1.2 billion court modernisation programme.
The failure meant that court files could not be retrieved, jurors could not be empanelled, and barristers could not register for attendance payments.
The Ministry of Justice issued an online statement apologising to those affected, stating: ‘We know this is unacceptable and how deeply frustrating this has been for our staff and users.’
Richard Atkins QC, the chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘I have no doubt that the Ministry of Justice and HMCTS are doing all that they can to rectify this major problem, but it illustrates how vulnerable the delivery of justice is with reliance on weak IT systems in our courts.
‘Whilst HMCTS is moving forward with its programme of online justice, these problems would suggest that more investment in the basics is needed first. We cannot have a justice system that comes to a shuddering halt the moment the IT does not work properly.’
Chris Henley QC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association, issued a statement which said: ‘Short-term savings often result in wider costs to the public purse and cause a broken criminal justice system to fall further apart. Crumbling court buildings are bad enough for court users – both the public and criminal practitioners – but digital failures can have far more profound consequences for all those awaiting trial.
‘Prolonged IT failures do a disservice to the victims of crime and their families who may have already suffered the costs of delays from an already overstretched, chronically underfunded, broken criminal justice system.’
Legal blogger and author the Secret Barrister tweeted to say: ‘The entire digital infrastructure of the courts has been broken for days. Phones aren’t working, court computers are offline, email is down. Imagine the headlines if it were the NHS. But it’s only justice, so no one cares. No accountability, no lessons learned.’
The justice minister, Lucy Frazer, was forced to attend the Commons chambers and apologise for the fiasco. She denied that the problems were caused by a cyber attack, and put it down to an issue ‘caused by an infrastructure failure in our supplier’s data centre’. She said: ‘We are very disappointed that our suppliers [Atos and Microsoft] have not yet been able to resolve the network problems in full,” she added. Penalty clauses in the contracts with the suppliers could be invoked.’
Frazer told MPs that all judges would receive a personal letter from Sir Richard Heaton, the permanent secretary at the Ministry of Justice.
The Independent Group MP and barrister Anna Soubry said: ‘If we had a better, more fully funded system, there would be proper backups and this rumbling problem would have been sorted out a long time ago… The system is now reaching crisis point and funding is primarily a problem.’
Thousands of cases were disrupted after the main court computer system went down at hundreds of courts across the country last month.
The chaos, during which trials were adjourned and hearings delayed, is an embarrassment for the Ministry of Justice, which is seeking to increase its use of online and digital hearings through its £1.2 billion court modernisation programme.
The failure meant that court files could not be retrieved, jurors could not be empanelled, and barristers could not register for attendance payments.
The Ministry of Justice issued an online statement apologising to those affected, stating: ‘We know this is unacceptable and how deeply frustrating this has been for our staff and users.’
Richard Atkins QC, the chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘I have no doubt that the Ministry of Justice and HMCTS are doing all that they can to rectify this major problem, but it illustrates how vulnerable the delivery of justice is with reliance on weak IT systems in our courts.
‘Whilst HMCTS is moving forward with its programme of online justice, these problems would suggest that more investment in the basics is needed first. We cannot have a justice system that comes to a shuddering halt the moment the IT does not work properly.’
Chris Henley QC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association, issued a statement which said: ‘Short-term savings often result in wider costs to the public purse and cause a broken criminal justice system to fall further apart. Crumbling court buildings are bad enough for court users – both the public and criminal practitioners – but digital failures can have far more profound consequences for all those awaiting trial.
‘Prolonged IT failures do a disservice to the victims of crime and their families who may have already suffered the costs of delays from an already overstretched, chronically underfunded, broken criminal justice system.’
Legal blogger and author the Secret Barrister tweeted to say: ‘The entire digital infrastructure of the courts has been broken for days. Phones aren’t working, court computers are offline, email is down. Imagine the headlines if it were the NHS. But it’s only justice, so no one cares. No accountability, no lessons learned.’
The justice minister, Lucy Frazer, was forced to attend the Commons chambers and apologise for the fiasco. She denied that the problems were caused by a cyber attack, and put it down to an issue ‘caused by an infrastructure failure in our supplier’s data centre’. She said: ‘We are very disappointed that our suppliers [Atos and Microsoft] have not yet been able to resolve the network problems in full,” she added. Penalty clauses in the contracts with the suppliers could be invoked.’
Frazer told MPs that all judges would receive a personal letter from Sir Richard Heaton, the permanent secretary at the Ministry of Justice.
The Independent Group MP and barrister Anna Soubry said: ‘If we had a better, more fully funded system, there would be proper backups and this rumbling problem would have been sorted out a long time ago… The system is now reaching crisis point and funding is primarily a problem.’
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
National courts are now running the bulk of the world’s war crimes cases and corporate prosecutions are part of this growing trend, reports Chris Stephen